|
Return to Rev.
Debra Haffner's Sermons index.
Bringing
Out the Best in Me
October 3, 2010
Opening Words:
Lord, make me an instrument of your peace;
where there is hatred, let me sow love;
where there is injury, pardon:
where there is doubt, faith;
where there is despair, hope
where there is darkness, light
where there is sadness, joy
O divine Master,
grant that I may not so much seek to be consoled as to console;
to be understood, as to understand;
to be loved, as to love;
or it is in giving that we receive,
it is in pardoning that we are pardoned,
and it is in dying that we are born to Eternal Life.
Amen.
SERMON:
Bringing Out the Best in Me
During Jim Francek’s
summer service, Pat Francek read these words by Oriah Mountain Dreamer: "What
if the question is not why am I so infrequently the person I really want to be, but why do I
so infrequently want to be the person I really am?" It was one of those
moments in church that stops time, where the service goes forward, but I am
still thinking about the words just spoken. Why am I so infrequently the
person I really want to be? Why do I so infrequently want to be the person I
really am? Both seemed like really important questions, personal questions,
but also deeply theological and spiritual questions.
I
have been keeping an annual journal during the Jewish High Holidays since 1980.
Every year, on either Rosh Hashanah or Yom Kippur, sometimes both, I take
myself to a quiet place to review the previous year, take a personal accounting
of my joys and sorrows, accomplishments and failures. I started the journal
when I was 26. Each year, I begin this process as the Bible says “In the
beginning,” by reviewing the years gone by. I watch my life as a sexologist, my
first calls to Unitarian Universalism, my deciding to have a child, being
pregnant, becoming a mom, my move to ministry emerge through these thirty
years. Each year, I end by writing commitments to myself for the coming year
and asking forgiveness.
Here’s
part of what I wrote in 1983: Be less controlling. Be a better sister,
friend, partner. Relax more. Play more. Exercise. Eat well. Lose weight.
Here’s what I wrote in
1998: Lose weight. Exercise 4 to 5 times a week. Develop a regular spiritual
practice. Be more patient. Let go.
Here’s what I wrote a
few weeks ago: Stretch daily. Meditate daily. Exercise 3 to 5 times a week.
Read more. Maintain weight loss. Play more. Take one day off a week. Bless
more, control less.
A little more sophisticated
perhaps, but remarkably similar, huh? I’m guessing a number of you would have
similar lists, similar issues that you have been hoping you’d outgrow, move on
from. Maybe in some of us they are more dire- Stop using drugs. Stop drinking.
Stop gambling. Martin Buber wrote that humans are the “promise making, promise
breaking, promise renewing animal.”
The poet asks, "Why am
I so infrequently the person I really want to be? I know that my days go better when I mediate first thing in the
morning, but often I feel too rushed to do so. I know that I feel better when
I exercise regularly, but I often get out of the habit. During Lent this past
year, I took up a practice of reading a book on theology each night after
dinner, and I really benefited from doing it, but I’ve largely stopped. I know
that the people around me want me to bless more, control less. I know that
sometimes I am short with others, impatient with them or myself, cranky. Ralph
will sometimes say to me in the middle of a disagreement when I am being less
than loving in my tone, “Can the minister come out now?”
Because
there is something about ministry that calls me to my better self. I
experience it directly when I am wearing my clerical collar for a public event,
lobbying day, or protest. I used to wear my collar frequently when I went to
meetings in D.C., to signal that I was talking to Congressional staffs or
organizations as a religious leader. I find myself nicer, more patient, more
likely to offer help, to smile, and greet others when I am wearing the collar.
It’s hard to get upset at the person behind the ticket counter when you are
dressed this way, a symbol in many ways of faith in general. People treat me
differently as well: people who I presume are Catholic often do double takes,
not accustomed to seeing women in what they associate as male priest clothes.
A female TSA officer couldn’t stop apologizing as she patted me down, “Pastor,
I’m so sorry I have to do this…” And people often stop and ask me for help,
assuming that I will listen. And I do.
As
an aside, I think someone of you may remember why I stopped wearing my collar
on airplanes. As I’ve shared before, I don’t do well in turbulence, and on a
plane trip about two years ago, I had my eyes shut and was praying hard as we
bounced around the sky. I felt the person next to me, tug on my shirt. I
looked up from my prayers. “Pastor,” he said, “You’re freaking the rest of us
out.”
But,
I kind of miss that visual opportunity to remind myself to bring the best of me
to my interactions. I think as people, we are always looking for ways to be
better in the world. The Reverend John Buehrens, in his new book “A House for
Hope: The Promise of Progressive Religion in the 21st Century”,
co-authored with Rev. Rebecca Parker, writes, “We are created in the
context of relationships, promises, commitments. We either break them, make
new ones, modify them, or renew then. ..We are covenantal by nature…and all
authentic covenants are created, sustained, and renewed in authentic hope.”
The traditional
Christian answer to the poet’s question “why am I so infrequently the person I really want to be?” is that we are
inherently sinful, that because of the Fall in the Garden of Eden, we all
deviate from God’s original plan for us. In a story that I first heard in
Divinity School, President Calvin Coolidge went to church alone one
Sunday when Mrs. Coolidge was home ill. When he came home, she asked, “What
was the sermon about?” “Sin,” said the terse President. She persisted, “But
what did the minister say about it?” He answered, “He was against it.”
Part of the traditional
answer to sin in many Christian churches is to follow the Ten Commandments,
despite the fact that most Americans can’t name more than five of them. A
survey by the Pew Center for Religion and Public Life that came out last week
found that although the majority of Americans come from a Christian faith and
almost 4 in ten say they read the Bible regularly, half believe that the Golden
Rule, do onto others as you have them do on to you, is part of the Ten
Commandments. It is not. Perhaps it’s not surprising that in another poll ten
percent of Americans thought that Joan of Arc was Noah’s wife!
The Ten Commandments,
found in the book of Exodus and Deuteronomy, are actually 16 verses that
different faiths combine in different ways to come out to ten. Protestants,
Roman Catholics, and Jews have different ways of combining them. Basically
though, regardless of version, the Ten Commandments laid out broad principles for
ancient Israel’s community life in a series of “Thou Shalt Not’s.”
Interestingly, only one of the ten commandments, Honor Thy Father and Mother,
is written as a proactive statement of behavior. The first three of the
Commandments are about worshipping God: not to have other gods before me, no
graven images, not to swear falsely using the name of God…the others are about
personal conduct: not to work on the Sabbath, not to kill, commit adultery,
steal, bear false witness, or covet your neighbor’s house, his slave, his ox or
his ass, or anything that is your neighbors. Little wonder that despite our
cultural attachment to the idea of the Ten Commandments, not many people can
name them and few could claim that they obey all of them – and that even
the most ardent supporters of their display would distance themselves from the
idea that there are other gods besides God or that slavery was okay if not
coveted.
It’s easy for us as
Unitarian Universalists to dismiss or indeed resist those who would enshrine
the Ten Commandments; after all, we are a religion without a creed and surely
our morality is more sophisticated than prescriptions of what we are not to do.
And we clearly understand why they should not be posted in schools or court
houses, where they would privilege some religions over others.
But, in some ways, the
Unitarian Universalist Principles and Purposes serve a similar function for us;
they are in many ways a shared set of belief statements and a covenant
about how we will be together. But, you may not recognize them by those words.
Last week, we voted to include the Principles at the end of our mission
statement. You may be surprised to find out that the Principles and Purposes
were only approved in their current form 25 years ago, and that our own Denny
Davidoff had a major role in getting them passed. I hope someday she’ll tell
us that story herself.
But, I wonder if we all
know what they are. I confess I often refer to them INCORRECTLY as the
Principles and PRACTICES, because of their behavioral implications, but they
are the principles and purposes. Like Christians and the Ten Commandments, I’m
guessing that most of us can’t remember or name all of them. I think most
Unitarian Universalists, indeed most UU ministers, can name only the 1st and 7th Principle: We affirm and promote the “inherent dignity and worth of every
person” and “respect the interdependent web of all existence of which we are
apart.” Without opening your hymnal, let’s see if we can list the others:
2) justice, equity and
compassion in human relations
3) acceptance of one
another and encouragement to spiritual growth
4) free and responsible
search for truth and meaning
5) right of conscience
and the use of the democratic process
6) the goal of world
community with peace, liberty, and justice for all
Perhaps we should all
make a commitment – including me – to memorize them.
Embedded in the words
and wisdom of the Principles and purposes are many of the answers to the type
of person we most want to be: just, compassionate, accepting, searching for
truth and meaning, moral, and committed to peace, liberty, and justice for all.
For many people, our
most challenging Principle is our affirmation of the inherent dignity and worth
of every person. We understand that as our call to reach out to the most
vulnerable, the most marginalized among us, and it stands behind the Unitarian
Universalist Associations’ commitments to work to affirm of the rights of
immigrants, people of other faiths, and LGBT persons.
This week, our hearts
broke as we heard or read the story of Tyler Clementi’s suicide at Rutger’s
University because of his roommate’s decision to film and then distribute a
tape on the Internet of Tyler kissing a boy in their room. Surely we know that
a tape of Tyler kissing a girl would probably never have been made, not have
been circulated. We hurt for Tyler and his family and a world where gay teens
are still being driven to kill themselves rather than proudly affirm who they are.
We understand that sexual diversity is part of creation or God’s blessing to
us, and that all people have dignity and worth.
But can I extend that
to his roommate and his friend who posted the tape in the first place? Where
is our compassion and affirmation for those who commit hate crimes, who
advocate intolerance or worse, violence, who commit terrorist acts? The
Unitarian Universalist opposition to the death penalty grows out of our 1st Principle…but how do we extend that here in Connecticut to the men who so
randomly and violently killed the Cheshire Dr’s wife and children?
And I’m reminded that
these issues don’t have to be quite so stark. A few years ago, I preached a
sexuality sermon in Schenectady, New York. I talked about our faith’s
commitment to sexuality education, reproductive justice, and LGBT full
inclusion. A woman came up to me in the coffee hour. “I really disagreed with
something you said,” she told me. “I’m not surprised”, I answered. “I know I
talk about controversial things. Which part did you disagree with?” She said,
“That part about love your neighbor as yourself and the dignity and worth of
all people.” I answered, “Oh, you mean like how does that extend to people
like terrorists or Hitler?” She looked at me, puzzled. “No, I mean people
right here. People I don’t like very much, who sit on committees with me, they
don’t deserve my love or respect.” I thought to myself, the hardest part of
loving your neighbor as yourself, may be loving yourself first.
Which brings me back to
the poet’s questions: Why am I so infrequently the person I really want to be?
Why do I so infrequently want to be the person I really am? Part of that
answer comes from our own family histories, our own time in childhood when we didn’t
receive unconditional love, from our own histories of brokenness. How easy it
is in my life for me to become once again the toddler left to cry it out on her
own as Dr. Spock then advised parents or the 7 year old bullied by her
classmates with the Hate Debbi Haffner club. I have finally come to accept
that I will never fully put away parts of me that still cry out for acceptance
and approval, even as I understand them better each year. I think it is
important to accept that all of us have a shadow side, in psychodynamic terms
an id that we need to acknowledge and own.
Part of it is our own
fears- fear of the unknown, fear that we are not good enough, fear of failing.
I have so many conversations with people in jobs they hate, relationships that
don’t fulfill them, but they are afraid of the next step.
The responsive reading
said it well, “it takes an act of will to make a turn. It means breaking with
old habits. It means admitting that we have been wrong, and this is never
easy. It means losing face. It means starting all over again; and this is
always painful. It means saying, I’m sorry.”
Saying I’m sorry. It’s
not just hard for two year olds, though surely all of us who have been parents
or grandparents know that there is nothing harder than asking a preschooler to
say I’m sorry. The Lord’s Prayer most importantly for me says, “Forgive us our
trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.” When I am not my best
self with regard to others, I need to say, “I’m sorry.” Sorry for being rude,
for being cross, for not treating you as I wish to be treated myself. My friend
Dr. Bob Selverstone has a sign in his couple’s counseling office, “Talk to me
like I am somebody you love.” As I’ll talk about in my Odyssey classes
starting next week, the most frequent problems in marriages and other long term
relationships are that people who once chose to love each other forever start
criticizing each other, become defensive, and treat each other with contempt.
The antidotes we’ll discuss in that class are learning to complain without
blame, take responsibility, and build a culture of appreciation. I hope some
of you will decide to sign up on the list in the foyer.
And, I also think we
need to practice self forgiveness. As Unitarian Universalists, we ask not so
much that God will forgive us, but that we can forgive ourselves. The Dalai
Llama, who I follow on Twitter, sends out almost a daily reminder that we must
have compassion for ourselves and compassion for others to bring about peace in
the world.
And part of it lies in
committing ourselves to self care – taking the time, making the time to
take care of ourselves. I am a better person, wife, mother, colleague,
minister when I take the time to eat well, meditate, exercise, and I need to
remind myself that that allowing myself to burn out neither serves my ministry
or me. Parker Palmer, writing about his own journey, said, “Self-care is never a selfish act -- it
is simply good stewardship of the only gift I have, the gift I was put on earth
to offer to others. Anytime we can listen to true self and give it the care it requires,
we do so not only for ourselves but for the many others whose lives we touch.”
Accepting who we are and where we come from.
Saying I’m sorry, asking for forgiveness. Practicing self care. Having
compassion for everyone we meet, as Frank regularly reminds me, including
having compassion for ourselves.
Those are part of my answers to the questions. You
will have others. I hope you’ll share them. I still sense that for me there
are other answers to these questions, that they are indeed lifelong questions.
And that they are
questions we can struggle with together in community, calling each other to be
our best selves together. Rebecca Parker writes in “A House for Hope”: “life
is protected and saved by those who embody presence, wisdom, resistance, gratitude
and humility. These are the gifts people can bring to one another and can
foster through long participation and practice as members of religious
communities devoted to saving and protecting life, rooted in rituals of praise
and thanksgiving.” May together we become the persons we really want to be,
the persons we know we are.
Return to Rev.
Debra Haffner's Sermons index.
|